A non-governmental organisation, Face Of Waziri-Nigeria (FOWN) has alleged that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is making frantic effort to frustrate at least two of the Justices at Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) to resign, so as to make mess of the judicial panel.
The group’s Director General Comrade Bukky Adeniyi made this assertion in a statement issued in Lagos on Thursday 20th July 2023.
Adeniyi maintained that given the existing legal proviso which necessitates a replacement and retrieval in case the Justices resigns and consequently translates to buying time beyond that stipulated by the Supreme Court is a ploy to make the case statute barred and of no effect.
FOWN while revealing the perceived surreptitious move, notes that Tinubu attempt to make the Justices resign is basically targeted at ensuring the time frame of 180 days elapses before the case is concluded by the panel.
Adeniyi said: “The Justice has not resigned at the moment but we have it on good authority that Mr. Tinubu and his team are seriously working hard to threaten and frustrate one or two of them to resign so that the panel will be bereft of jurisdiction at this stage.
“This will lead to replacement and retrieval de novo. In which case, it will be statute barred once outside the 180 days stipulated by the constitution and attendant of which ends the matter, because Supreme Court cannot extend time.
“At the moment Tinubu is pressuring the tribunal. He wants two judges to withdraw or resign from the panel.” Adeniyi said.
The group also cited a former PDP Governor from the South-South turned APC lackey having allegedly helped to rig elections in Tinubu’s favour within the zone is now being used to hoodwink the justices to give favourable decision.
“A particular Governor formerly with the PDP but now in APC sequel Tinubu’s blessing from South-South is delegated to use document of money exchange between the government of that state and one or two of the justices in the past for judgement favour then, as a proof to harass and intimidate the justices to shift the judgement of the tribunal in their favour.
The group however raised some poser on the matter: “How do you explain if at all such money exchange occurred in the past, to now want to use such to blackmail the Justice?
“Did the Justice or justices demands for money the governor gave then or was given as thank you? In whatever case, the tribunal matter is different from whatever transaction they had together in the past.
In its resolve to ensure justice is served without undue interference, the group also tried to inform Nigerian populace and others across the globe about how Tinubu has tried again to shroud in secrecy his Chicago State University saga having known that the truth if revealed will further worsen his plight.
“He faulted the recent move by the counsel to the Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar to subpoena the institution on the need to ascertain authenticity of documents relating to his attendance at Chicago State University.
“Abubakar had in a petition dated July 11, 2023, by and through his attorneys, requested the court to “issue subpoena commanding a corporate representative of Resident Chicago State University (Respondent) to appear for deposition upon oral examination of the topics set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto at the offices of Dechert LLP at 35 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3400, Chicago, Illinois 60601 on July 21, 2023 at 9.00am”
The respondent is expected amongst other things to, “testify and give evidences and in support thereof states as follows: “That non-party Bola Ahmed Tinubu is currently the President of Nigeria and is facing various court proceedings concerning his election and the authenticity of documents relating to his attendance at Chicago State University; “That Mr. Tinubu had previously asserted that he attended various educational institutions located in the Chicago area, including but not limited to Chicago State University; “To test the truth and veracity of Mr. Tinubu’s assertions, Petitioner must depose a corporate representative of Respondent Chicago State University (Respondent) regarding educational record or lack thereof, from respondent;
“To identify and determine if Mr. Tinubu attended above-mentioned institution, petitioner needs deposition testimony regarding the following information, as outlined in Exhibit A, including but not limited to admission information pertaining to Mr. Tinubu, proof of enrolment and attendance of Mr. Tinubu, and any degrees Mr. Tinubu attained from the Respondent.”
