By Ibrahim Kegbegbe
In a bold move, the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) recently announced a ban on the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages in sachets, PET, and glass bottles of 200ml and below. This decision has triggered a wave of protests from various quarters, notably the Distillers and Blenders Association of Nigeria and concerned citizens represented by the Food Beverage and Tobacco Senior Staff Association and National Union of Food Beverages and Tobacco Employee (NUFBTE) as they stormed the NAFDAC Complex office, Isolo, Lagos in thousands on Tuesday, February 6, 2024.
As the controversy unfolds, it is crucial to examine the potential consequences of such a ban and question whether the intended benefits outweigh the unintended social and economic fallout.
One of the primary concerns voiced by protesters is the staggering impact on employment. With over a million jobs at stake, the ban threatens the livelihoods of countless breadwinners who rely on the alcoholic beverage industry for their income. In a country already grappling with high unemployment rates, this move by NAFDAC risks exacerbating the job crisis and pushing even more individuals into the oversaturated Nigerian labor market.
Beyond the immediate economic repercussions, there is a genuine fear that the ban could inadvertently contribute to an increase in criminal activities, such as kidnapping and robbery. Unemployment has long been identified as a catalyst for crime, and removing a significant source of employment could potentially drive desperate individuals towards illicit means to sustain themselves and their families. The government must carefully consider the broader societal implications before implementing a measure that might inadvertently compromise public safety.
Moreover, the ban may have adverse effects on the informal economy, where many small-scale businesses operate within the alcoholic beverage sector. These businesses, often run by local entrepreneurs, contribute to the economic fabric of communities and provide a source of income for numerous families. Disrupting this ecosystem without adequate alternatives could lead to a domino effect, impacting various sectors connected to the alcoholic beverage industry.
While NAFDAC’s intention to regulate and ensure public health is commendable, it is essential to strike a balance between achieving regulatory goals and safeguarding economic stability. Rather than an outright ban, a collaborative approach involving industry stakeholders, regulatory bodies, and the government could be explored. This would allow for the development of comprehensive regulations that address health concerns while preserving jobs and mitigating potential social consequences.
It is very obvious that the ban on alcoholic drinks in sachets proposed by NAFDAC has sparked legitimate concerns regarding unemployment and its potential contribution to increased criminal activities. As the government contemplates regulatory measures, a holistic and consultative approach is imperative. Striking a balance between public health and economic stability will ensure a more sustainable and effective solution for all stakeholders involved.